Niyaz Fatehpuri is a prominent Urdu journalist; in other words, he possesses a God-given talent for writing inflammatory words.Tags: Richard Schechner Essays On Performance TheoryPhobia EssayWhat Are Note Cards For A Research PaperAp History Dbq EssaysCritical Thinking Course DescriptionReasoning Essays
8] Hindi soil and water have given Urdu its inherent shape, and that cannot be altered by inserting into Urdu a few Arabic and Persian words—a change of dress does not change anyone’s race or nationality. Niyaz might get, the Hindu cannot discard his rightful claim on Urdu, nor can he refrain from writing Urdu in his own way—no less than the Muslim who writes Urdu in his own manner. Niyaz may loudly complain that the Hindus were butchering Urdu, but so can the Hindus claim that the Muslims were slaughtering it, and more brutally at that.
9] A division or separation can take place only if the Muslims began to write [exclusively] for the Muslims, and the Hindus similarly for the Hindus.
 But no one had yet dared to be so blatantly prejudiced. Crores of Hindus today read Urdu, lacs of them write it, and thousands of them creatively express themselves in that language, be it in prose or poetry.
Urdu still continues to exist with the help of the Hindus.
It should not make anyone complain if they do not consider the Hindus as incompetent as Mr. And yet a mean-spirited journalist today has the gall to declare that this twenty-five years long literary service amounts to nothing! Niyaz cannot push them beyond the reach for any material token of appreciation.
Niyaz does, or if they do not think it improper to acknowledge the scholarship of certain Hindu writers and their long service to Urdu. Nigam’s services to Urdu’s cause would be a shameful oversight that only Mr. He should also remember that on the basis of religion [qaumiyat] Urdu will get at the maximum only one-third of any proferred amount, and that one-third would also count for Urdu’s [claimed] “historical importance” and “high dignity.
Every once in a while, he displays his own freedom of expression in sallies against religious truths and ethical values These briefly provide some entertainment in the assemblies of our friends.
 That is why, perhaps, no one ever feels any need to expose [the falsity of] his charges.
When these two qualities come together in an individual, can there be any doubt about his success as a journalist?
He delights the government on the one hand, and on the other greatly pleases his subscribers; meanwhile, people with some discretion watch him in silent amazement.