Try to remember that you don't need to narrate the events as they happened.I know it sounds so KS3, but literally Point Evidence Explanation actually works if you think of it like: answering the question; giving evidence to back up the view; linking different factors together (e.g.Splendid, I thought your comment was probably not a fair summary of your position which is why I didn't quote it.
Try to remember that you don't need to narrate the events as they happened.Tags: Nyu Stern 2009 EssaysEssayer Une Voiture Chez Un ConcessionnaireKids School EssayStrategic Planning Business DefinitionHow To Write Expository EssaysWinning College EssaysPsychosynthesis PsychotherapistPurpose Of An Illustration EssayEssay About The Dangers Of Overusing The Internet
So History not only tests your memory but it tests your skill more.
This is why I dropped History at A2..our exams I had the highest marks in the class; full UMS in one and 1 UMS into a B (that is, 70%, rather than 1 mark past the boundary) in the other.
Present each side with the knowledge that you find one or both of them limited.
For example, if we were talking about whether Magna Carta was the result of long-term or short-term causes, you might start by arguing that it is certainly true that, with regard to its immediate causation, it was the result of a baronial revolt/King John being horrible.
' And to score the top marks, I need to present both sides of the argument. That and my procrastination x D My essay is titled: 'How far can Russia be defined as a backwards state in 1855?
' And to score the top marks, I need to present both sides of the argument. x D I'll admit that I don't actually know anything about 19th Century Russia, but I use this generic structure for basically every History essay I do (except sources ones) and it normally gets me around 26-27/30.Did one go badly because I was less skilled, at the fundamental level, at source analysis, the content of the paper I did worse in?Nope, because I didn't - none of us did - know the proper exam technique for that paper (we had two teachers; one great, one not so great..).Everyone is different and different teachers want different things, so yours might be completely different to mine.As the year progresses, you'll figure out your own method but hopefully this will help as a starting point.I've just started Year 12 and A levels are already seeming impossible to do.I got an A for history in my GCSEs so i decided I would pick it up again as an A level course.Not to mention different sides of the argument preferably shown, if it's something like "Do you agree with this" or "To what extent is this true" I've just started Year 12 and A levels are already seeming impossible to do.Trouble is, I'm finding it difficult in writing/structuring my essay. Thank you (: An essay structure should flow logically.To be honest most of my class got A's and B's in my sixth form, but I personally hate it so much.So much work, and what I hate about it most is that I dont even want to call it History, because its more about exam technique at A-level you cant just enjoy learning the topic because if you cannot apply it then its a fail.