At the other side of well-being debate Democrats promote their vision of fairness.“They are rather skeptical that there is a linear relationship between individual effort, ability and reward and feel that a major function of government is to make life fairer” (Freeman 334).I reached out to him to find out what, exactly, he has in mind.
At the other side of well-being debate Democrats promote their vision of fairness.Tags: Personal Reflective Higher English EssaysSamples Of Business PlanExamples Of A Mission Statement For A Business PlanBusiness Continuity Plan ComponentsImportance Of Voice In An EssayObesity Much Of The Responsibility Lies With Corporations EssayHigh School Research Paper Topics Ideas
The logic of the essay was simple enough: The prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency was so positively ruinous that conservatives had no choice but to support Donald Trump — no matter how awful or incompetent he appeared to be. Until now, there was no left-wing equivalent to the “Flight 93” essay, no rallying cry that urged Democrats and liberals to do whatever is necessary to win.
But David Faris’s new book, , is the closest anyone has come so far.
Faris, a political scientist at Roosevelt University, argues that the Democratic Party must recognize that Republicans aren’t engaged in a policy fight; instead, they’re waging a “procedural war.” What he means is that Republicans have spent the past two decades exploiting the vagueness of the Constitution to create structural advantages for their side — passing discriminatory voter ID laws, using the census to gerrymander districts, blocking Democratic Supreme Court nominees, and so on.
Faris writes Democrats have to recognize this reality and act accordingly, especially now that the Republicans are poised to conquer the Supreme Court for a generation.
So, for example, the Democrats passed Obamacare and gave millions of people heath care, and yet tons of people who benefited from it have no idea what it is or how they benefited.
And it’s like that with a lot of policies — voters simply don’t connect the dots, and so they reward or punish the wrong party.
Thesis: beyond the controversial issues of federalism, unilateral military aggression, abortion, and same-sex marriages, both the Democratic and the Republican parties promote the need for prison privatization and military budget increase, supplemented by the political striving to cut the tax burden on the rich. Neither the Republicans, nor the Democrats are prepared to increase the tax burden, which the American population currently carries.
On the contrary, both parties are devoted to an idea of performing a significant tax cut, which will further promote the well-being of the rich and will only aggravate the social and financial state of the poor.
Since the ’90s, when Newt Gingrich took over Congress, we’ve seen a one-sided escalation in which Republicans exploit the vagueness or lack of clarity in the Constitution in order to press their advantage in a variety of arenas — from voter ID laws to gerrymandering to behavioral norms in the Congress and Senate.
What the Republicans did to Merrick Garland was one of the most egregious examples I’ve ever seen. They essentially stole a seat on the Supreme Court — a swing seat, no less. They violated the norms that have allowed these institutions to function normally for years and years.