Accordingly, research about the effect of parenthood on life satisfaction is increasing …Immigrants in developed countries typically fail to assimilate in terms of their subjective well-being, meaning that their happiness and life satisfaction do not substantially increase with their length of stay or across generations, and therefore …This study evaluates the potential value of eudaimonic well-being in assessing pro-preventive orientation towards suicide and recognizing suicide as a solution.
The aim was to integrate positive and negative conceptualizations of mental health for …This paper studies how consumption expenditures, especially spending on certain types of goods and services, affect people’s life satisfaction.
All pleasures, from the most fundamental (food, sexual pleasure) right through to higher-order pleasures (e.g.
monetary, medical, and altruistic pleasures) seem to involve the same brain systems (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2010).
Keep reading to discover a range of topics including the main theories of happiness, and a fascinating look at the neuroscience of happiness, as well as an interesting discussion on topics such as subjective well-being (the more scientific term for happiness), what positive psychology has to say about happiness, success and happiness, and more. If you think about it, the subjective nature of happiness makes it incredibly difficult to define and also challenging to measure (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2010). In the Past Happiness has been the topic of discussion and debate since the ancient Greek times. Science has looked closely at happiness as ‘hedonically’ defined – or, in other words, happiness is the outcome of the pursuit of pleasure over pain (Ryan & Deci, 2001).
Hopefully, it will answer some questions about happiness. Aristippus, a Greek philosopher from the 4th century BC claimed happiness was the sum of life’s ‘hedonic’ moments (Ryan & Deci, 2001).Since then, the social status of females has changed considerably across different nations …Emotional intelligence (EI) has been found to generally predict subjective wellbeing (SWB) indicators such as life satisfaction and happiness.Concerning the specific abilities of trait EI, i.e., mood attention, emotional clarity and mood repair …A study involving a large-scale social survey was administered to a representative German sample provided evidence demonstrating three information processing principles associated with life satisfaction judgments: (1) judgments of domain …The low perceived subjective well-being of potential parents has been put forward as an explanation for the low fertility rates in developed countries.Despite this exciting finding – a brain network for happiness – Kringelbach and Berridge (2010) say that to fully comprehend the functional neuroanatomy of happiness.As well as the findings from neuroscience supporting an anatomical basis to happiness, another component of a scientific explanation of happiness is the issue of measurement. Some individuals argue that maybe happiness should not be the subject of scientific explanation because it is impossible to objectively measure it (Norrish & Vella-Brodrick, 2008).Does this provide the opportunity to ‘measure’ happiness, therefore providing a scientific explanation of happiness?In fact, work of neuroscientists has found that pleasure is not merely a sensation, or thought, but rather an outcome of brain activity in dedicated ‘hedonic systems’ (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2010).According to Sigmund Freud (1930) people: ‘strive after happiness; they want to become happy and to remain so.This endeavor has two sides, a positive and a negative aim.Hedonic enjoyment is a state whereby an individual feels relaxed, has a sense of distance from their problems and, can be said to feel ‘happy’ (Ryan & Deci, 2001).Since the days of Aristotle, happiness has been conceptualized as being composed of at least 2 aspects – hedonia (or, pleasure) and eudaimonia (a sense that life is well-lived) (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2010). Well, research has shown that, whilst these two aspects are definitely distinct and that, in ‘happy’ people, both hedonic and eudaimonic components of happiness correspond (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2010).