The debate over junk food taxes is drawing increasing attention from both sides.Continued debate over of the adverse health impacts of sugary drinks is coupled with heating debate over the propriety of a tax on a dietary pleasure — a pleasure some believe people have an unassailable right to partake in, but others find to be a health hazard.
The debate over junk food taxes is drawing increasing attention from both sides.Continued debate over of the adverse health impacts of sugary drinks is coupled with heating debate over the propriety of a tax on a dietary pleasure — a pleasure some believe people have an unassailable right to partake in, but others find to be a health hazard.Tags: I Need A Business Plan WrittenEssay Correction WwNuclear Power Research EssayLosing The National And Cultural Identity EssaysResearch Paper Of ChemistryI Need Help On My Math Homework For FreeStonehenge Research PaperSample Of A Research Paper In EnglishNigerian Economy Essays On Economic Development
In the case of Hungary, for example, “initial, limited evidence suggests that the tax increased consumer prices of targeted products, reduced their consumption, and inspired some producers to reformulate products to get ingredient levels below the tax thresholds,” says the Tax Policy Center’s report.
Taxation will also generate a lot of extra tax dollars.
K., the public supports a ban on junk food advertising to children. television assumes kids are tucked up in bed, away from a screen, and only consenting, junk-food-loving adults are awake to be marketed to.
“Obese children are more likely to be obese as adults,” says Cancer Research’s head of health information Julie Sharp, “which in turn increases their risks of developing cancer in later life, along with many other health problems.”But banning ads before 9 p.m.
And what about changes in our nutritional knowledge?
In recent decades we’ve seen nutritionists recommend diets of mostly carbs, avoiding fat. What if all fats had been taxed back when carbs were king?
The key, then, is a wide-ranging approach, with taxes as just one tool.
Combined with things such as better education about healthful cooking, bans on advertising to kids, and creative uses for the extra tax revenue, taxes could shape how we eat and improve our health.
“A penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would generate almost billion annually in the United States,” says the report.
This is similar to the revenue raised by tobacco tax, and could be used to improve education and fund other healthy-eating campaigns, or even to subsidize healthier foods.