Reflective essays are academic essays; what makes an essay "good" will work for a reflective essay.
What is different about a reflective essay is that the essay is about you and your thinking.
A reflection is creating of an image which shares attributes with the real object, same way to reflective writing, you are required to describe a past event and show the reader how it repeats itself later on.
As an author there are some of the key points that you should have to yourself to come up with good content for your essay: Many examiners at different levels of education usually involve the students in writing of reflective papers because it helps them to reflect on what they study and its application in the real world.
Before you start your paper, you have to organize the points following the procedures below: At last, you should ask yourself the question to act as a guide in the presentation of your response to the reader.
Some of the common questions that you should engage your mind include: how does the situation affect your thinking?The notion of the stakeholder challenged many of the assumptions I have about the role of corporations in society.I hope to run my own business one day, and the distinction between stakeholders and shareholders really makes me think about what responsible leadership might look like.I come from country X, and I believe that it is also very shareholder-oriented.For example the company I used to work for did not seem to have much concern for its stakeholders.The diagram above, details how to stucture your reflections through the essay. Stakeholders are any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization's objectives.The shareholder view is more common in the US/UK and the stakeholder is more common in Continental Europe.As staff, we were worked extremely hard in poor conditions without overtime pay or paid leave (employees are a stakeholder group), and the company did not care at all about its impact on the environment.The company was just so concerned with cutting costs and making more profit for shareholders - usually at the expense of other stakeholders.What I appreciate about Friedman's view is its simplicity - the idea that companies pursuing their own profits creates the best outcomes for society (ref included).Adopting a stakeholder orientation (consistent with Freidman), and managing multifarious accountabilities and balancing trade-offs between them, would seem to be much more complex and a far greater challenge for leaders to navigate.