Molly’s perspective of the camp “I hate this place, makes me sick” drives her to take her siblings and commence a 1600 kilometre long journey back home, all they had to guide them was the rabbit proof fence a 1800 mile long landmark that bisects Western Australia from north to south.Ironically the same people who wanted to keep them from home had built the fence that guided them home.
Molly’s perspective of the camp “I hate this place, makes me sick” drives her to take her siblings and commence a 1600 kilometre long journey back home, all they had to guide them was the rabbit proof fence a 1800 mile long landmark that bisects Western Australia from north to south.Ironically the same people who wanted to keep them from home had built the fence that guided them home.Tags: Essay About School Starting LaterTransition Words EssaysDvla Assigning A Number Plate3 Piece Resume Cv Cover LetterEssay About Peace In WorldAbstract Of A DissertationEconomic Essay PapersThe House Of Seven Gables Ap Essay
At the beginning of the film, it is shown how Molly's family hunt for food and use their bush skills in their culture, to survive in their home land, while speaking their own language, doing what they do in their community.
Their community have their own civilisation and get taught their own lessons of their past generation of stories.
Phillip Noyce, director of Rabbit Proof Fence not only portrays the colonial setting of the time but also treats the story with respect and understanding of the cultural protocols that are required.
The Film is authentic as it is based on a true story.
The film Rabbit Proof Fence stands as one story that represents them all.
The distinct importance of the individual voices in The Stolen Children is replaced in the film by an intense visual.This visual representation emphasised through the use of symbols, such as the fence and the eagle, which symbolises Molly’s freedom.Rabbit Proof Fence stands as a cinematic analogue of Carmel Bird’s Stolen children.The authenticity of the film can be proven as it has been recorded in the local press as well as in the archives of the department of Native affairs.Furthermore Molly and Daisy are still alive and footage of them is shown at the end of the film. The director Phillip Noyce ensured that the film was culturally appropriated, by employing Pilkington Garimara, Molly’s daughter who is also the author of Following the Rabbit Proof Fence, which the movie is based on.The invaders are taking away the children and placing them in camps.Only three manage to escape on their epic journey home they must cross through enemy occupied territory, never knowing friend from foe.The viewer soon finds themselves on the children’s side, in their shoes and identifying with them, the viewer takes on the perspective of the stolen generation.Carmel Bird has used a written text that contains a report of separate oral accounts of the indigenous peoples past she seeks to detail the differing situations and outcomes of these people.The decisive moment in the chase that structures Rabbit Proof Fence is the confusion between two rabbit proof fences.The girls have unwillingly found themselves on the wrong fence this mistake miraculously saved them from being recaptured by Mr Neville.